🔗 Share this article

According to multiple government sources, China has allegedly threatened to respond against the United Kingdom if officials attempt to designate specific elements of its intelligence infrastructure under newly implemented external lobbying disclosure rules.

Diplomatic Strains Intensify

Beijing representatives reportedly communicated this message to the British diplomatic corps shortly following reports emerged that the British administration was considering such actions. This development has heightened alarm bells given the administration's ongoing reluctance to enforce more rigorous foreign influence regulations on lobbyists acting for Beijing or any segment of the PRC government.

Current Foreign Influence Registration Scheme

Currently, only Russia and Iran have been placed on the enhanced category of the external lobbying registry (Firs), which came into effect in the summer and became fully operational this month. This system mandates anyone in the UK representing a external government or organization to declare their activities to the government or risk legal penalties.

• The enhanced category covers nations and entities deemed a particular risk.
• It requires extra disclosures beyond the basic requirements.
• Consequently, any individual performing unregistered work on behalf of Tehran or Moscow could receive up to five years in jail.

Potential Designations

Previously, reports indicated that instead of designating China as a whole, ministers were considering including certain parts of the PRC governmental structure that have been alleged to conduct interference in European and North American nations to the stricter category.

These organizations allegedly include:

• The PRC's primary intelligence agency
• The Chinese Communist party (CCP)
• Beijing's united front apparatus
• The People's Liberation Army (PLA)

Collapsed Spying Case

Simultaneously, the administration is under growing pressure over the sudden dismissal of an spying case against two British citizens, comprising a former legislative aide. the first defendant, a former legislative assistant to Conservative MPs, and his associate the second defendant had been accused of spying for China.

Their trial was unexpectedly dismissed by the public prosecution authority in the autumn. The accused men had denied the charges.

Legal Complications

Media reports indicated that the government's refusal to officially characterize Beijing as an "adversarial state" in witness evidence from a intelligence representative contributed to the trial's dismissal. Jonathan Powell, the government's top security official, reportedly chaired a meeting in the UK government headquarters where he informed attendees that the government's evidence would avoid calling Beijing an enemy.

Government sources subsequently rejected the allegation that Powell was involved in restricting government evidence.

The judicial complication stemmed from the Official Secrets Act of 1911, which states that a individual is guilty of spying if they transmit data "directly or indirectly useful to an enemy". However, the current administration's national security strategy characterizes Beijing as a "geo-strategic challenge" rather than an adversary.

Continuing Diplomatic Relations

Despite these tensions, UK-China diplomatic ties appear to be warming. Multiple high-level government figures have traveled to Beijing on state trips since the current administration took office. These include the business secretary, who participated in commercial discussions recently, and Jonathan Powell, who traveled during the warmer months.

Furthermore, discussions have reportedly taken place between senior Foreign Office officials and parliamentary leadership regarding the prospect of lifting the prohibition on the PRC diplomat accessing the legislature, potentially in exchange for Beijing lifting its restrictions on British legislators.

The UK leader Keir Starmer is widely expected to make a bilateral trip to Beijing in the beginning of the new year, though the specific schedule might be dependent on international factors, including a possible trip by ex-American leader Donald Trump.